DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.
kcd at chrysler.com
Tue May 31 01:02:54 UTC 2011
Normally I'd defer to your vastly greater knowledge and experience in
DNSSEC, but here in the U.S. we have a saying "I'm from Missouri", which
is a roundabout way of expressing "show me" ("Show Me" being the
unofficial slogan of the state of Missouri). Maybe it *should* work, but
when it comes to nifty technical hacks, until co-existence is actually
demonstrated, I still think there might be a gotcha somewhere...
P.S. Don't even get me started on car commercials. I've seen a few that
never even made it to the public eye :-)
On 5/30/2011 8:18 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message<4DE42BEF.3050104 at chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>> Get back to us when you prove that this co-exists with DNSSEC; otherwise
>> it's a non-starter. While you're at it, some data proving that this
>> actually enhances performance or availability would be nice too.
> On further examination it will work w/ DNSSEC. As for availability
> it will decrease it as there is no way the client can do the failover
> for itself as it no longer has the necessary data. As for performance,
> your milage may vary, as they say in car commercials.
More information about the bind-users