about the additional section

风河 shorttag at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 04:23:19 UTC 2011


i just want to make sure about it, and will the client resolver use the
additional records directly?
在 2011-9-2 下午12:06,"Doug Barton" <dougb at dougbarton.us>写道:
> On 09/01/2011 20:45, 风河 wrote:
>> But why this named does returned additional section?
>
> Rather than focusing on the additional section in dig responses, maybe
> you can describe what problem you're trying to solve.
>
>
> Doug
>
> --
>
> Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
> -- OK Go
>
> Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20110902/1e42b2af/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list