zone update to slave
Jan-Piet Mens
jpmens.dns at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 09:51:36 UTC 2012
> $ORIGIN 184.16.172.in-addr.arpa.
> $TTL 14400 ; 4 hours
> 105 PTR GVC-E237-A01.wks-gvc.domain.com.
> 88 PTR GVC-LIB-C07.wks-gvc.domain.com.
> 9 PTR gvc-busdrivers.wks-gvc.domain.com.
> 90 PTR nb-csiler.wks-gvc.domain.com.
> 98 PTR GVC-RES-A05.wks-gvc.domain.com.
> 16.184.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR off-hp4050.gvc.domain.com.
> 24.184.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR str-r7500.gvc.domain.com.
> 22.184.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR lib-hp4300.gvc.domain.com.
> 11.184.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR res-hp4300.gvc.domain.com.
>
>
> It seems as if these types of records get transfered:
>
> 9 PTR gvc-busdrivers.wks-gvc.domain.com.
>
> But these do not:
>
> 24.184.16.172.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR str-r7500.gvc.domain.com.
You should find a record called
24 IN PTR str-r7500.gvc.domain.com.
on the slave. Note that BIND stores that below the current value of
$ORIGIN so that's fine and dandy. Query your slave for the PTR to verify
[ dig -x @slaveIP 172.16.84.24 ]
> If I delete the journal file on the on the slave server up the serial
> number on the master I get the same results. The first type of record
> is updated dynamically and the second type of record is added
> manually.
This sentence doesn't really make sense: updated dynamically vs added
manually? For the record, if you're using dynamic DNS updates to the
master, you should avoid editing the master zone file manually.
-JP
More information about the bind-users
mailing list