RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Thu Mar 1 12:51:49 UTC 2012

Spain, Dr. Jeffry A. <spainj at countryday.net> wrote:

> Which of these alternative empty zones should be used in the current DNS
> environment and why?

In my named.conf I have set up empty zones for the whole of 240/4. I view
RFC 6303 as the minimum necessary for a hygienic name server, but there
are a number of other permanent bogon address ranges which it makes sense
to stub out locally.

f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Fisher: West or southwest, veering east or northeast, 4 or 5, decreasing 3 at
times. Slight or moderate. Fog patches. Moderate, occasionally very poor.

More information about the bind-users mailing list