format error: CNAME response for DNSKEY RR

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Thu Oct 4 09:38:20 UTC 2012


Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

> > Why does named complain in this manner?
>
> It's fallout from the type code roll from KEY to DNSKEY.  KEY can
> exist beside CNAME so the CNAME is not followed for KEY, the same
> is not supposed to be true for DNSKEY.  I'll open a bug ticket for
> this.

Thanks!

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.



More information about the bind-users mailing list