Moving from "type forward" to "type static-stub"
chris.p.buxton at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 02:35:23 UTC 2012
On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> I have several recursive, caching BIND servers
> The current servers are configured to forward any queries for our domain straight to our authoritative servers
> I've been reading about the new zone type: static-stub and believe this may work better for us.
> If I'm correct, it will send non-recursive queries to the listed servers and will honor delegations. I've tested this configuration in our lab and it all appears to be working.
> With our configuration, are there any downsides to changing from forward zones to static-stub?
Type static-stub should work great here. Type stub, which has been around since before I started managing DNS servers (a very long time now), would probably also have worked.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the bind-users