IPv6 prefixes in ACLs

[Robert Moskowitz]

On 02/17/2013 12:43 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for
>> the nets I am currently using?
> Both ways work.
>
>> Does it make any difference for performance?
> Possibly, but I doubt you could measure it. (Unless you're using a
> really ancent version of BIND, in which case the shorter list is better.)

This whole adventure is to finally get current!  Well at least as 
current as Redhat (actually Centos) provides  :)

>> ::1/128 ; 2001:0db8:100::4/128;
>>
>> Is what you do for specific addresses?
> You don't need the /128.

Nice to know that the format is consistant across address times.

thanks