Difference between multiple NS and NS having multiple A

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>In message <CABUciRkAPvEyFr1s5ygu8=KfxDfLbJadauY4AsB4W_kWs5-tJQ at mail.gmail.com>
>, Alexander Gurvitz writes:
>> Is there any practical difference between the following two:

>> example.com. NS ns1.example.com.
>> example.com. NS ns2.example.com.
>> ns1.example.com. A 1.1.1.1
>> ns2.example.com. A 1.1.1.2

>> example.com. NS ns.example.com.
>> ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.1
>> ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.2

On 18.02.13 08:43, Mark Andrews wrote:
>Yes.  It makes fault isolation harder.

The same applies for servers behind load balancers. But the second case
makes adding nameservers easier, and makes more sure that some customers
don't decide to overload one of servers by adding any of them.

when BIND (or whomever) logs nameserver it should log both name IP.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.