MNAME not a listed NS record
lists at hireahit.com
Thu Jan 17 07:13:40 UTC 2013
On 1/16/2013 13:53, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> True, but I don't see much utility from a nameserver which can be dynamically
> updated but not queried.
It *can* be queried, it's just not ideal as the machine has a fair
amount of load and has fairly high latency. Since I have secondaries in
colocation facilities with available resources, it makes more sense for
them to handle external queries.
I'm also not sure where you're getting dynamic updates from, but we
don't do any dynamic updates through BIND at this time.
> Sure. In which case, why publish an internal-only machine into the public
> DNS via your SOA record?
Because it is actually the master, and from what I can tell, the slaves
will check against the MNAME to confirm whether they're up to date or not.
(Yes, notifies will usually take care of this. Usually.)
> Someone else made mention of a "stealth master",
> but my definition of that is an internal machine which is not visible in
> any publicly published records.
Strictly speaking, it's not internal-only, it's just on a slower,
occasionally overloaded connection which will result in some percentage
of requests taking significantly longer to answer. It's also on a
somewhat overloaded server, so it just makes more sense to push external
traffic to more ideal services.
More information about the bind-users