New warning message...
Barry S. Finkel
bsfinkel at att.net
Mon Jul 22 13:50:44 UTC 2013
> This was discussed here already, and imho this is anti-spf bullshit like
> all those "spf breaks forwarding" FUD. The SPF RR is already here and is
> preferred over TXT that is generik RR type, unlike SPF.
It is not Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt that "SPF breaks forwarding".
SPF *DOES* break forwarding. I have a case I am researching right now
where forwarded mail is undeliverable due to SPF checking at the
More information about the bind-users