barmar at alum.mit.edu
Tue Jun 4 05:37:15 UTC 2013
In article <mailman.424.1370323734.20661.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
"Novosielski, Ryan" <novosirj at umdnj.edu> wrote:
> If it were not already in the cache, I would not need to refresh the cache.
> Are you absolutely certain? If so, it is possible that this is a difference
> between BIND and AD DNS (I'm generally trying to refresh AD DNS caches), but
> I'm nearly certain I've used this to update a cached entry on a BIND-hosted
Try the following test:
Pick a name that has both A and MX records, but isn't currently in cache.
dig <name> a @server
dig <name> any @server
I have no idea what MS DNS does, but I'm pretty certain that if you
direct this to the BIND server the second query will only return the A
record, not the MX record.
More information about the bind-users