Stalling slave transfers
mail at tomsommer.dk
Wed May 8 18:15:55 UTC 2013
On 5/8/13 12:25 PM, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 08/05/13 08:26, Tom Sommer wrote:
>> I have a problem with one of 3 slave servers, all set up the exact same
>> way, with the exact same bind version and configuration.
>> One slave has a problem transfering zones from the master.
>> The logfiles are flooded with "received notify for zone" .. "refresh in
>> progress, refresh check queued" lines and "rndc status" returns a
>> constant high number of "soa queries in progress".
>> After a few hours the zones are transfers, so the connection to the
>> master is working, but there is a major delay. I tried resetting the
>> slave and transfering ALL slave zones again, which worked fine
>> instantly. The problem still appeared again after a few hours though.
>> The master has three network-paths, one on external IP, one on internal
>> IP and one on IPv6. All 3 paths work fine, because the transfers happen
>> after an hour or so.
>> There is no hints in the master's log.
>> The other two slaves are running perfectly, no errors or delays what so
>> Bind version 9.9.2-P2 (recently upgraded to).
>> Any hints would be appreciated, as I feel like I've exhausted most options.
>> Thank you.
> Have a look at this KB article (you'll need to register to view - but
> registration is open to all):
> Also - and this isn't covered in that article (yet) - if you're using
> views, then use-alt-transfer-source defaults to 'yes'. You might want
> to set it explicitly to 'no' or to define alt-transfer-source
> and/or alt-transfer-source-v6.
Thank you, great resource. I think I solved it with raising
serial-query-limit, it's just odd that it's not required on the other
Another issue has arisen now though, the logfile is filled with lots of
named: zone example.com/IN: refresh: failure trying master
188.8.131.52#53 (source 0.0.0.0#0): operation canceled
But if I do a "dig example.com @184.108.40.206" it's working just fine. Same
server as with the previous issue.
Any thoughts? Thank you.
More information about the bind-users