Clients Matching Multiple Views
dougb at dougbarton.us
Fri Apr 11 18:27:17 UTC 2014
On 04/11/2014 10:59 AM, John Wobus wrote:
> My understanding has been that two views that are masters for
> a zone can safely share a zone file if the zone isn't dynamic (e.g.
> dnsupdate, dnssec auto signing, etc), but that two views of
> a slave zone shouldn't do that: you could have two
> different views independently rewriting the same file, a bad thing even
> if the files are known to be identical. Furthermore, allowing that could
> conceivably show no problems very much of the time, masking the actual
You are correct. Include statements that reference the common data
between the zones on the master has been the canonical way to handle
this situation since day 1.
More information about the bind-users