barmar at alum.mit.edu
Mon Jun 9 22:07:11 UTC 2014
In article <mailman.401.1402350461.26362.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
Kevin Darcy <kcd at chrysler.com> wrote:
> That scenario still shouldn't have led to an NXDOMAIN. If none of the
> delegated nameservers are responding, you'd get a timeout or SERVFAIL.
> So I think there's still some investigation to be done. But using dig
> instead of nslookup at least makes things clearer :-)
Where did he say he got NXDOMAIN? He said he got "no name-server", which
is not a dig error I've ever seen. Maybe he was abbreviating from "No
nameserver could be reached", which is what dig says when it times out
waiting for a reply.
More information about the bind-users