Bad performance from BIND 9.10 on RHEL 6.5

Vinícius Ferrão ferrao at if.ufrj.br
Wed May 28 15:03:46 UTC 2014


Hello Mark,

Sorry but I was referring to 9.10.0-P1. I've forgotten the last zero.

> On 28/05/2014, at 11:53, "Mark Andrews" <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Please, please, please use the FULL version when reporting or
> commenting.
> 
> BIND 9.10-P1 does not exist.  BIND 9.10 is a feature set of which
> BIND 9.10.0 is the initial release and BIND 9.10.x (x>0) are
> maintenance releases or if you want to use Microsoft terminology
> Service Packs.  BIND 9.10.X-PY contain critical fixes often but not
> always for security issues.  They are intended to be minimalistic
> allowing for easier checking and quicker integration.
> 
> Remember all these messages get archived and indexed.  Not stating
> the full version will lead to issues later with answers being
> misinterperted.  It has happened in the past.  It will happen in
> the future.
> 
> Mark
> 
> In message <0AFE0AEC-FC1E-4973-B9C9-1FF613A9A001 at if.ufrj.br>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vi
> n=EDcius_Ferr=E3o?= writes:
>> I've had the same crash those days. Just check if you have the latest 9.10 ve
>> rsion. I wasn't running 9.10-p1.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On 28/05/2014, at 10:30, "Nicholas F Miller" <nicholas.miller at Colorado.EDU>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Not that they are related but we had a crash of bind about seven hours afte
>> r installing 9.10:
>>> 
>>> named[20831]: name.c:534: REQUIRE((((name) != ((void *)0)) && (((const isc_
>> _magic_t *)(name))->magic == ((('D') << 24 | ('N') << 16 | ('S') << 8 | ('n')
>> ))))) failed, back trace
>>> 
>>> Back to 9.9.5 for now.
>>> _________________________________________________________
>>> Nicholas Miller, OIT, University of Colorado at Boulder
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 27, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Shawn Zhou <shawnzhou00 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Amir,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No, I haven't found any tunings work on BIND 9.10. I filed a bug (ISC-Bugs
>> #35961) against ISC for them to investigate. By the way, are you running RHE
>> L as well?
>>>> Until the performance issue with 9.10 gets fixed, we will stick with 9.9.x
>> .
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscr
>> ibe from this list
>>>> 
>>>> bind-users mailing list
>>>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscri
>> be from this list
>>> 
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
>> from this list
>> 
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org


More information about the bind-users mailing list