A record of domain name must be name server ?

Pete Fong petefong2012 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 09:19:10 UTC 2014


Hi Matus UHLAR - fantomas,

Sorry, I do not understand the meaning of "It could only issue a problem if
you pointed "example.com. NS example.com."
or similar MX etc records."  Do you mind to explain more details ? Thank
you very much.

Best Regards,
Pete Fong



2014-09-08 16:06 GMT+08:00 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar at fantomas.sk>:

> On 08.09.14 15:43, Pete Fong wrote:
>
>> Subject: A record of domain name must be name server ?
>>
>
> no.
>
>  The below item is our DNS (BIND) server configuration. our Domain*
>> xxx.com
>> <http://xxx.com> *is assigned IP address 192.168.1.100 which is our one
>> of
>> DNS server. Can we change it to our web server IP address ?
>>
>
> yes.
>
> ... it's completely irelevant where does example.com A record point to.
>
>
> It could only issue a problem if you pointed "example.com. NS example.com
> ."
> or similar MX etc recods.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> I intend to live forever - so far so good. ______________________________
> _________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140908/29ad53cc/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list