A record of domain name must be name server ?
Mark Elkins
mje at posix.co.za
Thu Sep 11 15:51:52 UTC 2014
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 11:27 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Mark,
> Depending on implementation, a PTR RRset with multiple
> records either
>
> -- only ever gets answered with the "first" record of the set (in
> which case the second and subsequent records of the set are just a
> waste of space), or
> -- answers in a random, cyclic and/or round-robin fashion (in which
> case, the results are non-deterministic from the standpoint of a
> client, and this can cause problems and/or confusion)
Last time I checked, ALL matching records are returned as a single
Resource Record Set - (and in the case of DNSSEC - covered with a single
signature).
What the receiver does with it is up to that receiver... as you say -
some of the information may be discarded.
> So, although the standards allow multiple RRs, in practical terms, it
> only makes sense for a PTR RRset to contain a *single* RR.
I would still disagree. When there is forward<-->reverse checking, one
may need the complete answer. I certainly have some processes that do an
exhaustive check.
- Kevin
>
> On 9/11/2014 3:45 AM, Mark Elkins wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:13 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > > No, what I'm saying is that if
> > >
> > > example.com owns an A record 203.0.113.48, and
> > > www.example.com owns an A record 203.0.113.48, then
> > >
> > > where does 48.113.0.203.in-addr.arpa point?
> > >
> > > Some people will point it at example.com, some will point it at
> > > www.example.com. What you get is a mish-mosh. No consistency.
> > Although I prefer the use of a CNAME solution (CNAME www.example.com to
> > example.com), in the case of separate A (and AAAA) records, one could
> > point the reverse to both names. Nothing wrong with a PTR record having
> > more than one answer. There is then no inconsistency, just choice. After
> > all, pretty much every NS record has at least two Right-Hand-Sides
> > (Answers)....
> >
> >
> > > If, on the other hand, www.example.com is a CNAME to example.com, then
> > > it's crystal clear where the reverse record will point -- example.com.
> > > There is no ambiguity or option for inconsistency.
> > >
> > > - Kevin
> > >
> > > On 9/10/2014 5:48 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> > > > Hey Kevin,
> > > >
> > > > This is not an issue at all.
> > > > A PTR is different then a "A" record and can be used by two reverse
> > > > domain names and only the owner of the IP addresses space can define
> > > > them.
> > > > I am not sure if two PTR records for two domains will be applied to
> > > > one IP but it is possible for two IP addresses to have the same PTR.
> > > >
> > > > Can we even use a CNAME as a PTR???
> > > >
> > > > Eliezer
> > > >
> > > > On 09/11/2014 12:37 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > > > > Also, have you considered the forward/reverse ambiguity that arises when
> > > > > multiple owner names resolve to the same address? To which of those
> > > > > names does the PTR point?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Kevin
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> > > > unsubscribe from this list
> > > >
> > > > bind-users mailing list
> > > > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> > >
> > > bind-users mailing list
> > > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> >
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa
mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140911/5321b1c4/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list