bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
Mike Hoskins (michoski)
michoski at cisco.com
Fri Sep 12 19:05:34 UTC 2014
From: Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us>
Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins <michoski at cisco.com>, Thomas Schulz <schulz at adi.com>,
"bind-users at isc.org" <bind-users at isc.org>
Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
>On 9/12/14 11:07 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
>> I do have a lot of interest in the community getting to the bottom of
>> this, as we are just planning a large upgrade in one of our environments
>> which will move caching clusters serving 6-8k clients over to 9.10.1.
>Given all of the problems that have been reported with 9.10 you may wish
>to reconsider that plan.
Heh thanks, yeah...initially I was erring on the side of caution and using
9.9.x because it's served us well (~20k recursive clients without any
significant problems). Meanwhile we've been keeping a close eye on
community comments, and to be honest opinions wax and wane. Just as I
think it's stabilized, someone else complains. I suppose sticking to
9.9.x a bit longer is wise.
That said, based on the 9.10.1 fixes, we will run it through our own perf
tests for comparison. Upgrades are automated and easy, but I'd obviously
like to go live with the latest version unless there is a strong technical
More information about the bind-users