BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools

[Alan Clegg]

On 8/24/15 3:21 PM, nrgd at eml.cc wrote:
> Somehow all that ^ puffery translates into NOT wanting to allow the
> user to prioritize the use of forwarders the way they want?

You are trying to use forwarders in a way that they are not intended,
and is not a good idea.  That is the translation of all of the responses
to this point.

All puffery aside.

AlanC
-- 
When I do still catch the odd glimpse, it's peripheral; mere fragments
of mad-doctor chrome, confining themselves to the corner of the eye.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 561 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150824/d52d9d57/attachment-0001.bin>