DIG Info Request
Linux Addict
linuxaddict7 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 19:28:48 UTC 2015
Actually I tried +trace from BIND server itself and still get the same
answer. I did "dig . +trace @localhost"
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> . +trace @localhost
;; global options: +cmd
. 346239 IN NS i.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS c.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS b.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS e.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS d.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS l.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS f.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS j.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS h.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS k.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS m.root-servers.new.
. 346239 IN NS g.root-servers.new.
;; Received 405 bytes from localhost#53(localhost) in 1 ms
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Lyle Giese <lyle at lcrcomputer.net> wrote:
> 172.27.254.11 is giving you that info with the .new name servers. You
> need to ask whomever manages that server.
>
> Look at this line from your +trace output:
>
> Received 405 bytes from 172.27.254.11#53(172.27.254.11) in 1 ms
>
> Lyle
>
>
> On 2/3/2015 1:13 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> Additional info - general: warning: checkhints: unable to find root NS
> 'b.root-servers.new' in hints
>
> I cant seem to find where the ".new" coming from...
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Linux Addict <linuxaddict7 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The named.ca seems good.
>>
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> . 518400 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>> . 518400 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Lyle Giese <lyle at lcrcomputer.net> wrote:
>>
>>> If I remember right, DIG does not know the root servers and asks the
>>> local host to retrieve that information and a server at 172.27.254.11(which
>>> is RFC 1918 address space) gave you that answer.
>>>
>>> Is your machine/shop setup with private root servers?
>>>
>>> Lyle
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/3/2015 12:50 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
>>>
>>> I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
>>> causing SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas?
>>>
>>> dig . +trace
>>>
>>> ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> . +trace
>>> ;; global options: +cmd
>>> . 348510 IN NS b.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS h.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS l.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS f.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS m.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS k.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS i.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS e.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS g.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS j.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS c.root-servers.new.
>>> . 348510 IN NS d.root-servers.new.
>>> ;; Received 405 bytes from 172.27.254.11#53(172.27.254.11) in 1 ms
>>>
>>> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>>>
>>> bind-users mailing listbind-users at lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>>> unsubscribe from this list
>>>
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150203/8ab3c392/attachment.html>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list