Future of BIND's built-in empty zone list

[Reindl Harald]

Am 14.05.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Chris Thompson:
> Now that RFCs 7434 & 7435 have been published, how do ISC see the future
> of the seemingly ever-expanding built-in empty zone list in BIND?
>
> One possibility that seems plausible to me is to add EMPTY.AS112.ARPA
> to the list now, and remove existing entries if and when the corresponding
> names in the public DNS acquire DNAMEs pointing to that (hopefully ones
> with large TTLs)

hopefully not

the whole purpose of "emtpy zones" is to avoid *any* recursion, in the 
past you had to create all that empty zones at your own to reach that goal

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150514/ce22bba5/attachment.bin>