dname reverse delegation

Paul A razor at meganet.net
Wed Oct 14 14:33:02 UTC 2015


Yeah, it looks like I might have to give up on this.

paul

-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR -
fantomas
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:29 AM
To: bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: dname reverse delegation

On 14.10.15 10:11, Paul A wrote:
>Niall my problem is the name server that delegated the reserve does look up
the record correctly.
>
>I have this in the zone,
>
>                        DNAME 0/24
>;;
>;;; delegate to server
>;;
>0/24    NS      ns.someserver.com
>;;
>
>
>At the ns.someserver.com the looks ups work with no problems. However at
the main name server the PTR look up does not work.
>Not sure what im missing.

You have been already advised to avoid the ".0/24." NONSENSE.  You can
easily delegate x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA without putting useless (and as you
report, problematic) subdomain ".0/24."  there...

>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>x.x.x.in-addr.arpa.   172800  IN      DNAME   0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa. 172800  IN      CNAME   2.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 172800 IN  CNAME
2.0/24.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.0/24.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 172800 IN CNAME
2.0/24.0/24.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.0/24.0/24.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 172800 IN CNAME
2.0/24.0/24.0/24.0/24.x.x.x.IN-ADDR...........
>
>But the looking up the record on ns1.someserver.com works fine.
>
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>13.7.69.in-addr.arpa.   172229  IN      DNAME   0/24.x.x.69.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.13.7.69.in-addr.arpa. 172229  IN      CNAME   2.0/24.x.x.69.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
>2.0/24.13.7.69.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 172800 IN  PTR     x-x-x-x.rev.XXX.com.


>On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100,
>Paul A wrote:
>>
>> I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME.
>
>  Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so?
>  If not, you should probably reconsider.
[...]
>  Don't be distracted by RFC2317.  It describes the trickery you need  
> when you're dealing with a longer prefix (fewer addresses) than a  
> /24.  If you have "a few /24", you can deal with them without  needing 
> any of that.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages."
"That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
unsubscribe from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users



More information about the bind-users mailing list