logging bug for rpz at load-time?
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Sep 3 14:30:43 UTC 2015
On 03/09/15 15:14, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> The numbers are overall counts for that view, after the contents of that
> policy zone have been loaded. Cumulatively, they should match the number
> of records in your policy zones (named starts with empty RPZ state).
In that case, those counts are absolutely not correct (see below)
>> This is on 9.10.2-P4
> If these numbers (for the view) don't match up, can you try reproducing
> this with 9.10.3-rc1 and let us know what you get? There have been some
> bugfixes since 9.10.2.
It'll be a couple of weeks before I could look at that - my availability
is poor for the next while.
> How many policy zones do you have? If you can, please send us your named
> configuration and the expected number of RRs that you intend to see.
I'm a tiny bit uncomfortable exposing the detailed config here given
what it does.
There are three zones, and the config basically looks like this:
# Local black/whitelist - currently 486 RRs
# Commercial feed #1 - approx 600k entries
zone "rpz.<feed1>" policy ...;
# Commercial feed #2 - approx 750 entries
I restarted named to get it to log them, and I saw:
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<feed2>' changed from 0 to 5458 qname
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<local>' changed from 5458 to 25032 qname
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<feed1>' changed from 25032 to 1216066 qname
I then immediately restarted it again, and coming up with the *same*
zone contents, a few seconds later, it logged:
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<feed2>' changed from 0 to 0 qname
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<local>' changed from 0 to 19089 qname
(re)loading policy zone 'rpz.<feed1>' changed from 19089 to 1216066 qname
So they're basically totally fictitious - is it maybe logging the counts
while the following zone(s) are loading in i.e. some concurrency thing?
More information about the bind-users