Installing bind is not very clear for me
noel.butler at ausics.net
Sat Sep 5 02:12:33 UTC 2015
On 05/09/2015 11:41, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> Actually, PIX had issues... I can attest to that, having administered
> several Cisco-based networks including PIX years before I was "a Cisco
The biggest issues we really saw with PIX protected networks was in
it used to bite in smtp transactions, it never liked qmail.
> That said, PIX was at least stateful (unlike ipchains, as you know that
> was the big selling point of iptables),
I should also have included that some people even today still configure
iptables wrong blocking fragmentation, though not a huge problem as in
early days since netfilter guys must have added code to accommodate
those who dont know better, but it still happens.
> AAA infra (also didn't really like the state of PAM back then)... as
> is now, the best approach really decided on your use cases.
PAM is evil, its why I like slackware, much much less evil :)
More information about the bind-users