Question about dynamic IPv6-PTR-Generation
matt at conundrum.com
Fri Aug 26 19:46:56 UTC 2016
On 26 August 2016 at 15:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar at fantomas.sk>
>>> On 26.08.16 14:01, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>> That's not necessarily true for IPv6, where even a modest network could
>> have trillions of addresses that may need PTR records.
> that's exactly why using $GENERATE and/or creating new mechanism for that
$GENERATE is useless in that situation, yes. But something that provides
rules to a name server to synthesize responses (vs actually generating all
18446744073709551616 PTRs in a /64) is not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users