Writeable file already in use

[Darcy Kevin (FCA)]

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram

										- Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 12:19 PM
To: bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Writeable file already in use



Am 05.01.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Barry Margolin:
> In article <mailman.13.1452009325.73610.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
>   Alan Clegg <alan at clegg.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>>>> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
>>>
>>> .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having 
>>> to recurse to a `dig axfr').
>>>
>>> I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-)
>>
>> I ran into one exception to this rule - it seemed that the customer 
>> had security requirements that did not allow "transient data" to be 
>> written to disk.  They had to make sure that if the physical device 
>> was stolen, all of their zone data didn't follow it out the door.
>
> The in-memory copy is likely to end up in the swap partition

a proper dimensioned server has no swap partition at all, at least no one od the servers i am responsible since 2008 had one and *for sure* the memory requirement of a authoritative nameserver is pretty clear to don#t need it