Multiple AD domains

Chris Buxton clists at buxtonfamily.us
Thu Jul 28 16:52:20 UTC 2016


The OP's question was about setting up BIND, not MS DNS, related to using Samba, not Windows, as the domain controller.

Regards,
Chris

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.darcy at fcagroup.com> wrote:
> 
> My preference? Have all your clients use BIND to resolve DNS (this gives access to more advanced features like sortlisting, good query logging, blacklisting/redirection through the RPZ mechanism, Anycast, etc.). Set up the BIND instances as slaves for the AD zones, and have the AD folks add the BIND instances to the apex NS records so that the DCs will trigger fast replication to BIND via the NOTIFY extension to the protocol.
>  
> I’d never let a regular PC client use Microsoft DNS for resolving DNS. Perish the thought!
>  
> Note that this approach, if implemented simply, doesn’t scale to large numbers of BIND instances (because you don’t want to add dozens or hundreds of apex NS records to the zone). Beyond a certain threshold, you’d want to set up a multi-level slaving/NOTIFY hierarchy on the BIND side…
>  
>                                                                                                                                                                                                                  - Kevin
>  
>  
>  
> <image001.jpg>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Darcy
> NAFTA Information Security Projects
>  
> FCA US LLC
> 1075 W Entrance Dr,
> Auburn Hills, MI 48326
> USA
>  
> Telephone: +1 (248) 838-6601 
> Mobile: +1 (810) 397-0103
> Email: kevin.darcy at fcagroup.com
>  
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Sadowski
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:00 PM
> To: bind-users at lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple AD domains
>  
> should I setup 192.168.1.1 as slaves to these two domains would that fix it?
>  
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On the samba mailing list they described setting up the DC as the NS and forward to another machine for more rules.
> This will work fine for one domain. Now lets say I have 2 domains.
>  
> If I setup forwarders like so on 192.168.1.1
>  
> zone "domainA" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 192.168.2.1; }; };
> zone "domainB" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 192.168.3.1; }; };
>  
> It will cache entries for each domain and if a computer gets a different address for dhcp it will update on the domain's DNS but the dns on 192.168.1.1 will have a cached entry untill it expires.
>  
> 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 are setup to forward all other zones than their domain names to 192.168.1.1
>  
> if I have DNS server set for all machines in domainA to 192.168.2.1 all machines on domainA see any DNS changes to domainA imediately machines on domainB are cached and can take time to clear out.
> And
> if I have DNS server set for all machines in domainB to 192.168.3.1 all machines on domainB see any DNS changes to domainB imediately machines on domainA are cached and can take time to clear out.
>  
> What is the best way to resolve this issue?
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20160728/66b78b0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list