Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

Tony Finch dot at
Fri Jun 17 10:19:47 UTC 2016

Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.darcy at> wrote:

> My understanding is that the "extra" stuff wouldn't have any signature
> at all.

I'm not sure if the question was that well specified :-)

> Wouldn't that break DNSSEC if the rest of the response had signatures?
> Or does the DNSSEC-validation algorithm support "hybrid" responses like
> that?

I believe BIND works more like the latter but unbound works more like the

f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at>  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Bailey: Variable becoming southeast 3 or 4, increasing 5 or 6. Slight or
moderate. Rain later in southwest. Good.

More information about the bind-users mailing list