PCS, Corosync, Pacemaker, and Bind
dot at dotat.at
Wed Mar 16 00:40:02 UTC 2016
Mike Bernhardt <bernhardt at bart.gov> wrote:
> I'm setting up a new CentOS 7 DNS server cluster to replace our very old
> CentOS 4 cluster. The old one uses heartbeat which is no longer supported,
> so I'm now using pcs, corosync, and pacemaker.
I suggest having a look at keepalived: it's significantly simpler.
> I want BIND to listen on, query from, etc on a particular IP address,
> which is virtualized. The options currently used are:
> query-source address
> listen-on isn't a big deal, but the source address options are.
Why do you care about the query source address?
I don't set any of those options and just let BIND pick whatever source
address it wants; it might choose the server admin address or the
advertised service address, and that doesn't matter because everything
else is configured to accommodate this.
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Shannon, Rockall: Southeast 4 or 5, increasing 6 at times in Shannon. Moderate
or rough. Fair. Mainly good.
More information about the bind-users