acl

[Reindl Harald]

Am 08.10.2016 um 16:57 schrieb Pol Hallen:
>> 192.168.1/24 is not a valid netmask
>
> huh?
> In linux and BSD I always use 192.168.1/24 (how shortcut of
> 192.168.1.0/24) and so on...
>
>> hint: using /24 everywhere is nonsense
>
> why?
>
> My goal is allow 192.168.1.0/24 (net) and deny 192.168.1.50 (host)

beause the netmask for a single address is /32 and not /24 - that 
simple, if it would be right to always write /24 then the stuff would 
not be needed at all :-)