"spare hosts" as personal DNS nameservers for 'mynew.org'
bind at zq3q.org
bind at zq3q.org
Tue Jul 11 21:01:44 UTC 2017
On Tue 7/11/17 15:24 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2017/07/11 14:57, bind at zq3q.org wrote:
> > I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
> > for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. **Neither are in 'mynew.org';
> > is that going to work?**
> Yes, that will work. There is no requirement for any of the NSes for
> a zone to be part of that zone or, conversely, not part of that zone.
This seems imp:
> Although if any of the NSes are in the zone, there should be glue
> records added at the level above.
As I wrote to Niall (msg dated 11 Jul 2017 15:04:32 -0500) ,
I **do not** have a NS record for each of my two
nameservers, in the domain zone that the respective nameserver itself is in.
That is a mistake, I need to fix, right?
> > namecheap support seems to suggest that the personal DNS authorative
> > nameservers for 'mynew.org', must be in 'mynew.org', as in
> > ns1.mynew.org ns2.mynew.org
> This is not a requirement from the DNS side. It's normal for
> providers to offer this -- vanity name servers are usually a selling
OK. Thanks for that term "vanity name servers".
> Even so, if you can make ns1.mynew.org and ns2.mynew.org resolve to
> the A or AAAA addresses of your VMs, you should be good to go. named
> is going to work the same irrespective of whatever it thinks the
> hostname of your VM is, and that can be different to the name users
> look up in the DNS.
> Failing that, there are any number of other providers that will let
> you register a domain, and the vast majority of those certainly will
> let you specify your own nameservers.
If you have a specific registrar in mind with good support pls let
More information about the bind-users