Different forwarder for cerain response ip (result ip )

[Reindl Harald]

Am 16.09.2017 um 13:30 schrieb Alberto Colosi:
> I read so well your answer and wasn't an answer to you
> 
> 
> in all case ,                who said I can't use port 53 if blocked ? 
> 😲         are many ways       without a VPN that usually is a paid 
> service or a company service for who have it.
> 
> 
> In all case even VPN even 443 is open, can be dropped 😲 ... pass 443 
> (browser) but not VPN.
> 
> 
> In all case here wasn't a discussion on hacking or bypassing protections 
> or limitations! So I'll quit any other answer on this topic over the 
> real question.

jesus fix your quoting style and english - non of your responses was in 
any case helpful and other than you people with expierience guess what 
the reason for somenon.default configs likely is

your answer to "Actually my situation is a bit strange . But as 
explanation i can say that our upstream provider do dns manipulation on 
normal ports 53 tcp/udp" coming with "port 53 is only open directed to 
forwarders" and "I think u should read how DNS works, TLD and so on 
simply drop forwarders only use TLD" is nonsense

when the ISP of his upstream internet connection mangles traffic on port 
53 and you still recommend drop forwarders and use port 53 who is the 
one which don't undertand DNS or the topic

can you please refrain from answering to each and every post in a thread 
you obvisouly don't understand?

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> on behalf of 
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 16, 2017 12:59 PM
> *To:* bind-users at lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Re: Different forwarder for certain response ip (result ip )
> 
> 
> Am 16.09.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Alberto Colosi:
>> even on hotel ......... why not to use a BIND on unix or window on ur 
>> box u r using ?
> 
> did you read what i repsoned and too and did you try to understand my
> answer?
> 
> a default bind with recursion won't work when it can't connect to the
> world in case it is redirected to a hotel nameserver and when you can
> only connect to 80/443, well then your BIND on the box you are using may
> use a nameserver you own in the web running on 443
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> on behalf of 
>> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 16, 2017 12:46 PM
>> *To:* bind-users at lists.isc.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Different forwarder for certain response ip (result ip )
>> 
>> 
>> Am 16.09.2017 um 12:32 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>> 1. who runs DNS servers on port 443?
>> 
>> likely people which where bitten by hotel access points where 53 is
>> catched to a internal nameserver and outgoing only 80/443 are possible,
>> the same reason many people have a VPN server on 443