Need help on RPZ sever, bit urgent
Blason R
blason16 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 02:39:22 UTC 2018
Well mine is bit different. I have RPZ and almost 400000+ RPZ entries wall
gardened. And in my scenario users are talking to windows based AD/DNS
server and then that server has forwarder set to RPZ.
1. First issue; I observed certain entries from BIND/RPZ zone are being
resolved by windows server directly to their original IPs and not the
wall-gardened IP. Where I believe once the forwarder is set all those
queries should have been routed to RPZ server? [If anyone here having
Windows DNS expertise, pls help]
2. And another, certain RPZ queries if queried through AD/DNS server are
not at all getting resolved. When I captured packets on BIND/RPZ server I
see that those domains are getting NXdomain by RPZ and not sure why.
Thanks and Regards,
Lionel F
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bob Harold <rharolde at umich.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM Blason R <blason16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For example this one.
>>
>> 18:59:26.905177 IP 192.168.1.120.65049 > 192.168.1.42.53: 42074+ A?
>> 0351dag.com. (29)
>> 18:59:26.905299 IP 192.168.1.42.53 > 192.168.1.120.65049: 42074 NXDomain
>> 0/1/0 (102)
>>
>
> With RPZ, the name is looked up normally first, and only if there is an
> answer, is RPZ invoked. If it gets NXDOMAIN or some error, it returns that
> and does not use RPZ.
> If that is not what you want, then you probably want to set the option:
> qname-wait-recurse no;
>
> --
> Bob Harold
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:59 PM Blason R <blason16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bind-Users,
>>>
>>> I would really appreciate if someone can help me understanding my issue
>>> with BIND RPZ server?
>>>
>>> I have one windows server say 192.168.1.42 and then RPZ server with
>>> 192.168.1.179. I noticed that there are certain domains which are not
>>> getting resolved from end users.
>>>
>>> Ideally since those end user has 192.168.1.42 DNS Server set and has
>>> forwarder set to 192.168.1.179 should forward all queries to 1.179, right?
>>>
>>> But certain domains from my response-policy are even though
>>> wall-gardened those are being catered as NXdomain.
>>>
>>> Anything I am missing pertaining to RPZ?
>>>
>>> Or if I am querying all those domains directly to RPZ server then I am
>>> getting proper answer. This issue is noticed when I have forwarder server
>>> is between
>>>
>>> options {
>>> version "test";
>>> allow-query { localhost;subnets; };
>>> directory "/var/cache/bind";
>>> recursion yes;
>>> querylog yes;
>>> forwarders {
>>> 1.1.1.1;9.9.9.9;208.67.222.222;8.8.8.8;
>>> };
>>> // dnssec-validation auto;
>>> request-ixfr yes;
>>> auth-nxdomain no; # conform to RFC1035
>>> // listen-on-v6 { any; };
>>> listen-on port 53 { any; };
>>> listen-on port 15455 {any;};
>>> response-policy { zone "whitelist.allow" policy passthru;
>>> zone "wg.block";
>>> zone "bad.trap";
>>> zone "block.tld";
>>> zone "ransomwareips.block"; };
>>> };
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180810/c043a57f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list