Minimum TTL?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at
Thu Feb 8 16:10:38 UTC 2018

>Reindl Harald <h.reindl at> wrote:
>> yes, you are free to decide that named don't need to support the users wish of
>> such a feature. but the result is that the user stops to use named at all on a
>> inbound-mailserver and is done

On 08.02.18 16:07, Tony Finch wrote:
>Or you could use patched versions from FreeBSD or Debian ...

FYI, it's there for years.

bind9 (1:9.6.0.dfsg.P1-1) experimental; urgency=low

   [Michael Milligan]

   * Add min-cache-ttl and min-ncache-ttl keywords

   [LaMont Jones]
   * Fix merge errors from 9.6.0.dfsg.P1-0

  -- LaMont Jones <lamont at>  Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:50:50 -0600

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at ;
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

More information about the bind-users mailing list