Minimum TTL?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at
Sat Feb 10 04:57:06 UTC 2018

Am 10.02.2018 um 05:11 schrieb John Levine:
>> But to answer your question, off-hand, I'd say that any TTL under 60s is =
>> suspicious and any TTL under 10s is almost certainly intentionally =
>> abusive.
> I hope you're not planning to do much spam filtering

i do for years with a min-ttl of 90 secods and you will have a hard-time 
to beat our results - using a mix of many DNSBL/DNSWL on postsrceen as 
well as SpamAssasin does the trick and not ordianry low TTL's

More information about the bind-users mailing list