simonkbaby at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 22:13:48 UTC 2018
Thanks Warren. I will look into https://getdnsapi.net/ .
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:42 PM, SIMON BABY <simonkbaby at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Evan,
> > Thank you so much for the quick response.
> > My requirement is to implement only the recursive resolve and validation
> > part of the DNSSEC in my client application. Our CPU and memory are very
> > limited. So I am not sure I can go and use BIND 9.
> I get that this is bind-users, but have you looked at
> https://getdnsapi.net/ ?
> > With BIND 9, can I integrate the library in my application to send
> > and validate the answer in my client code itself. Can you please point if
> > any sample code.
> > Rgds
> > Simon
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Evan Hunt <each at isc.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:08:18PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> >> > I am trying to implement the full recursive resolver with libbind
> >> > library
> >> > in my client code. I am not using resolv.conf in my implementation.
> >> > anyone please help to point any sample code for this.
> >> Not even BIND uses libbind anymore.
> >> What's the purpose of this? Why not just use BIND 9, or some other
> >> existing resolver?
> >> --
> >> Evan Hunt -- each at isc.org
> >> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> > unsubscribe from this list
> > bind-users mailing list
> > bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users