intermittent SERVFAIL for high visible domains such as *.google.com
Brian J. Murrell
brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Tue Jan 23 11:31:48 UTC 2018
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:45 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> lame-servers is also a log category, and tends to be quite noisy
> various problems :-)
Turns out I do already have lame server logging enabled. I.e.:
20-Jan-2018 12:01:37.053 lame server resolving 'backup-ns.yn.cninfo.net' (in 'yn.cninfo.net'?): 22.214.171.124#53
20-Jan-2018 12:01:37.054 lame server resolving 'backup-ns.yn.cninfo.net' (in 'yn.cninfo.net'?): 126.96.36.199#53
But there isn't a single lame server message with "google" anywhere in
This problem is really not looking like a lame delegation issue,
wouldn't you agree?
Any further ideas?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the bind-users