intermittent SERVFAIL for high visible domains such as *.google.com

Brian J. Murrell brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Tue Jan 23 11:31:48 UTC 2018


On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:45 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> 
> lame-servers is also a log category, and tends to be quite noisy
> about
> various problems :-)

Turns out I do already have lame server logging enabled.  I.e.:

20-Jan-2018 12:01:37.053 lame server resolving 'backup-ns.yn.cninfo.net' (in 'yn.cninfo.net'?): 202.98.160.68#53
20-Jan-2018 12:01:37.054 lame server resolving 'backup-ns.yn.cninfo.net' (in 'yn.cninfo.net'?): 202.98.160.68#53

But there isn't a single lame server message with "google" anywhere in
it.

This problem is really not looking like a lame delegation issue,
wouldn't you agree?

Any further ideas?

Cheers,
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180123/813fc3ce/attachment.bin>


More information about the bind-users mailing list