nested CNAMEs resolution failures?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at
Mon Jan 29 15:37:54 UTC 2018

>PGNet Dev < at> wrote:
>> Can these response timeouts be accommodated directly in the script?  Or
>> only by, perhaps, increasing the global query timeouts from default 10
>> sec?

On 29.01.18 15:08, Tony Finch wrote:
>Yes, there's a bootstrapping problem here ... possibly the easiest way to
>avoid depending on a server that sends cookies when reconfiguring it not
>to send cookies, is to point the script at In my setup the script
>runs in a dev environment generating a static file that is deployed to
>production, but it's effectively the same trick of making the script use a
>different DNS server.

this way you just delegate your problem at 3rd-party (although google)

I wonder if it's possible and useful to use the same fallback mechanism to
disable cookies as is used to disable EDNS or to reduce UDP size...

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at ;
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod

More information about the bind-users mailing list