Question about Delegation/forwarder
barmar at alum.mit.edu
Sun Apr 28 04:15:27 UTC 2019
In article <mailman.495.1556306063.711.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
Gawan Re <vootlavonage at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a bind server with recursion disabled.
So this should be an authoritative-only nameserver, not a resolving
> One of the subzone is delegated to external name servers for which we are
> not authoritative. The records inside this subzone would not resolve as the
> subzone is delegated to external name servers and I have recursion
Why is this a problem? The client nameserver should follow the
Stub resolvers should not point to a server that has recursion disabled.
> My question is, While I have the delegation is in place (even though it is
> useless), is there a way to override Delegation (and possibly replace with
> forwarders) ?
Forwarders are only used when recursing. If recursion is disabled,
forwarders are useless.
More information about the bind-users