SSHFP observation

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>On 1/31/19 12:30 PM, rams wrote:
>> Thank you Mukund,Jim and Alan to look my issue.
>>
>> We are seeing the issue only when sshfp fingerprint value less than 4
>> characters.
>>
>> It is working fine value with >=4 characters.

On 31.01.19 12:33, Alan Clegg wrote:
>These are not valid SSH Fingerprints.
>
>Garbage in, garbage out.
>
>I see no bug.

well, either BIND should reject those records as invalid and not to send
them, or dig (from bind package) should not complain about malformed
responses.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.