Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Apr 15 12:21:11 UTC 2020
Am 15.04.20 um 14:17 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
> On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 10:35 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Thanks for answer!
>> So actually it is just a cosmetic change not addressing a real problem.
>> I will miss the bind9 service :-(
> Wait until you find out about Predicatable Network Interface Names and
> iptables rules. :)
"net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" is your friend :-)
More information about the bind-users