DoH plugin for BIND

[Victoria Risk]

> On Apr 29, 2020, at 11:06 AM, Michael De Roover <isc at nixmagic.com> wrote:
> 
> On that subject, how about DoT? I have mixed feelings about using 443 as a kitchen sink port but encrypting DNS seems like a good idea.

We are planning to have DoT on the same timeline as DOH, so nobody has to choose one or the other based on availability.

> 
> On 4/29/20 9:40 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>>> Does BIND have a DoH plugin official?
>>> Or is there any guide to customize that one?
>> Not yet, but we plan to have a DoH implementation in named by the end of
>> this year.
>> 
>> In the meantime, there are DoH proxies that can run BIND as the back-end.
>> 
> -- 
> Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
> Michael De Roover
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Victoria Risk
Product Manager
Internet Systems Consortium
vicky at isc.org





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20200429/a4bf040b/attachment.htm>