Error "Query section mismatch : got"

tale d.lawrence at
Wed Aug 19 14:05:50 UTC 2020

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<uhlar at> wrote:
> again, why you query for
> under normal circumstances there's no point of querying that name.

Well yes and no.   While an individual user would typically not,
resolvers sure will.  While trying to resolve, it will eventually get to CNAME
 Then it will need to resolve the canonical name, and a response like
the original one that was shown will be clearly buggy.

I say "possibly" because from my vantage, all three of
ns{,1,2}, the authorities for, are giving fine answers right now (on
udp; blocked on tcp).   This includes the originally reported problem


More information about the bind-users mailing list