Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

[@lbutlr]

On 21 Jul 2020, at 06:37, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2020, at 18:23, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Bind is a poor choice for desktop use. Packages like unbound are much better for that sort of use, and it is fr less critical if those packages have security issues.
> 
> Anything that talks to the net is critical path from a security perspective.

There are different levels of critical, and unbound is a lot further down that list that bind.



-- 
We are born naked, wet and hungry; then it's all downhill.