Does BIND supports ANAME RR
ondrej at isc.org
Mon Aug 9 17:18:54 UTC 2021
No, and there’s no strong usercase for that. The ANAME was wrong on every level from the protocol perspective and I am glad it is gone.
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 9. 8. 2021, at 17:23, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of HTTPS/SVCB? That is what I meant.
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
>> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55
>> An: Klaus Darilion <klaus.darilion at nic.at>
>> Cc: Evan Hunt <each at isc.org>; Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>; bind-
>> users at lists.isc.org
>> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
>> Every resolver on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB. Every
>> authoritative server on the planet already supports HTTPS and SVCB via
>> unknown record format. iOS is already making HTTPS queries for every
>> webpage. I believe other browsers also make HTTPS queries today. Go look
>> at your DNS traffic.
>> The MR mentioned earlier allows named and the other tools to load and
>> display the records in presentation format and to do the additional section
>> processing. None of that it required to be able to return these records. It
>> just makes it easier.
>> Just about all the other DNS vendors also have code that can read and
>> display presentation format.
>> ANAME is dead.
>> Mark Andrews
>>> On 9 Aug 2021, at 21:53, Klaus Darilion via bind-users <bind-
>> users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Evan
>>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21
>>>> An: Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kansal at nic.in>
>>>> Cc: bind-users at lists.isc.org
>>>> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
>>>>>> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes,
>>>>>> then from which version on wards ?
>>>>> No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt
>>>>> it'll be coming back.
>>>>> The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway.
>>>>> BIND will have support for those pretty soon.
>>> But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years until
>> all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
>> implemented in the authoritative name server and hence would work for
>> every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the
>> A/AAAA record.
>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
>> from this list
>>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
>> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
More information about the bind-users