views-based RPZ

[Grant Taylor]

On 8/24/24 07:37, Carlos Horowicz via bind-users wrote:
> 2. if RPZ records are held in memory, why would an RPZ zone need to be 
> stored n times if there are n orthogonal views ? That is, why the more 
> views the more memory needed. Maybe you meant the qpcache, to store 
> different answers, though I don't understand how that works.

I believe that some newer versions of BIND can share zone information 
across multiple views.  Check out the "in-view" statement that goes in a 
zone {...} clause.

Link - Chapter 7 BIND zone clause
  - https://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/zone.html#in-view



-- 
Grant. . . .
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4033 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20240824/446ba8cf/attachment.p7s>