qname minimization: me too :(
Peter
pmc at citylink.dinoex.sub.org
Mon Jun 24 20:32:37 UTC 2024
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 04:58:55PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
! On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:03:14AM +0000,
! 65;6800;1c Michael Batchelder <michael at isc.org> wrote
! a message of 59 lines which said:
!
! > You'll need to fix these zones so that the response is NOERROR rather than NXDOMAIN.
!
! Yes and, if you want the whole context, you can read RFC 8020
! <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8020> and section 4 of RFC 7816
! <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7816>.
Sure, I did that already. And I also talked to the maintainer of
ns*.he.net, i.e. this one:
! > The f.1.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa zone (@216.66.80.18) responds with NXDOMAIN to queries for any QTYPE for QNAME f.1.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa
! >
! > You'll need to fix these zones so that the response is NOERROR rather than NXDOMAIN.
And they seem to think, there is nothing wrong with that, because
nobody ever has complained about that.
Now I am really wondering: why do I, an unemployed old guy just
running his own computer, suddenly find myself in between a root
operator and the biggest v6 network on the planet?
In other words: why do You guys no longer talk to each other?
cheerio,
PMc
More information about the bind-users
mailing list