dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com aaaa lookup fail
Walter H.
Walter.H at mathemainzel.info
Wed May 1 12:25:45 UTC 2024
On 01.05.2024 01:33, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> On 1 May 2024, at 03:32, Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:40 PM Walter H. wrote:
>>> On 29.04.2024 22:19, Lee wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 2:18 AM Walter H. via bind-users
>>>> <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> something that I replied to and got this in response:
>>>>
>>>> Error Icon
>>>> Message blocked
>>>> Your message to Walter.H@[..snip..] has been blocked. See technical
>>>> details below for more information.
>>>>
>>>> The response from the remote server was:
>>>> 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: Use IPv4
>>>>
>>>>
>>> For explanation: this is MY mail server, which blocks IPv6 connections from
>>>
>>> Outlook.com
>>> Gmail.com
>>> ...
>>>
>>> as these are the biggest SPAM senders
>> Which is fine .. your server, your rules.
>> But maybe what isn't so fine is me replying only to the list and still
>> getting a 'rejected: Use IPv4' msg. I don't know how the mailing list
>> works; I'm a bit surprised that I can reply only to the list, get the
>> Client host rejected msg and somehow you can still get the msg??
there are 2 pair of shoes, mails from the list are not from Outlook.com
or Gmail.com
but if you put my mail address to "To: ", then its from Gmail.com ;-)
> This is
> what happens when you put something into the rejection rules which has zero
> relationship whether something is spam or ham.
depends ...
> I just find it interesting that someone using mx01.ipv6help.de as a MX would be
> so interested in punishing IPv6 use.
you are mixing up 2 independent things ...
IPv6 clients aren't blocked at all, just Outlook.com, Gmail.com, ...
that is the difference; just for Outlook.com the following fact is true
but bullshit
# host -t MX outlook.com
outlook.com mail is handled by 5 outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com.
# host outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com has address 52.101.8.47
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com has address 52.101.9.15
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com has address 52.101.40.30
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com has address 52.101.194.14
#
as you see no IPv6 at all;
why then the need of accepting their SPAM on IPv6 transport?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3550 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20240501/561e3ff4/attachment.p7s>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list