SIG(0) "request has invalid signature: not verified yet (NOERROR)"
Malcolm Scott
Malcolm.Scott at cl.cam.ac.uk
Tue Nov 5 17:53:02 UTC 2024
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024, Malcolm Scott wrote:
> Regardless I'll try adjusting the algorithm choice in case it does make a
> difference.
So far I can report that using a ECDSAP384SHA384 key for the SIG(0) still
encounters the same failure mode. (For tedious reasons the client I chose
to test can't do ED25519. More experimentation ongoing. But the problem is
not specific to RSASHA512.)
More information about the bind-users
mailing list