Question about post-quantum X25519Kyber768

[Robert Wagner]

>From my poke a few months back - stuff like PQC and NSA's Commercial Solutions for Classified settings need to go through the RFC process. Since both the DNS server and DNS client need to be on the same page as to which cipher suites they agree on.

Around 10/16:

Robert, if you'd like to propose standardizing SHA-512 for use in DS records please propose this in an Internet Draft — there is a helpful page here: https://authors.ietf.org/en/home .

W



Robert Wagner


________________________________
From: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> on behalf of Carlos Horowicz via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 7:32 AM
To: bind-users at lists.isc.org <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
Subject: Question about post-quantum X25519Kyber768

This email originated from outside of TESLA

Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi there,

does anyone know of the bind developers thinking of incorporating
post-quantum cryptography into bind9 , like Cloudflare with
X25519Kyber768 on BoringSSL ?

I'm just curious about if there are thoughts or ongoing work, or if this
is in the near roadmap at all.

Thank you,

Carlos Horowicz
Avascloud/Planisys

--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20250102/d9e7c2e1/attachment.htm>